🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an international accord created to protect females from violence, covering family violence, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to oppose the decision. The final decision now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last year, mandating governments to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread outcry both inside the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian appeal calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for additional consideration if he has objections.

Head of State the national leader stated on social media that he would assess the decision according to legal requirements, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence similar discussions in additional EU countries