🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actress has joined the increasing number of actors who express doubts about the necessity of intimacy coordinators, revealing she chose not to use their services while filming her latest project her upcoming film.

Understanding the Purpose of Intimacy Coordinators

On-set intimacy professionals emerged following the #MeToo era to guarantee the safety and ease of actors during scenes involving partial undress and intimate moments. Yet, numerous well-known actors including Gwyneth Paltrow and Sean Bean have voiced concerns about their presence, with several suggesting they disrupt creative flow.

Lawrence's Personal Experience

In conversation on the popular culture podcast, while promoting her latest project where she portrays a character descending into mental health challenges, the actress commented: "We did not have an intimacy coordinator, or maybe we did have one but didn't make use of their services... I felt completely safe with Robert."

She elaborated: "He is not pervy and very committed to Suki Waterhouse. Our conversations mostly focused on our children and relationships. There was never uncomfortable moments or questions about personal boundaries."

"Had there been the slightest indication of discomfort, I would have insisted on an on-set professional. Many male performers get upset if you don't reciprocate their advances, and then the negative treatment starts. He was not like that."

Industry Recognition and Continuing Discussion

Earlier this week, industry platform IMDb officially recognized on-set intimacy professionals as a distinct credit, together with eleven other crew positions including dance direction, craft services, and puppetry. Previously, they were categorized as "miscellaneous staff" rather than having their own designation.

Despite this recognition, intimacy coordinators still encounter public discussion suggesting they aren't necessarily required standards, with high-profile actors rejecting their involvement. Jennifer's viewpoint mirrors that of Jennifer Aniston, who previously shared she declined intimacy coordination while working with her co-star on The Morning Show.

Aniston's Experience

"He proved to be extremely respectful – truly every move, between takes, 'You comfortable?'" she remembered. "The scenes were also very choreographed. That's the benefit of working with talented directors, appropriate music. So, you don't prepare."

She added, "Production suggested, 'Professional verification if you're comfortable,' and I responded, 'Honestly, this is awkward enough!' We're seasoned actors – we can manage appropriately. And we had Mimi on set."

Additional Cases and Industry Reaction

Despite featuring multiple sequences of sexual activity and frequent nudity, the award-winning film – Sean Baker's acclaimed project about a sex worker and a Russian oligarch's son – proceeded without an intimacy coordinator.

The film's star stated she and fellow actor Mark Eydelshteyn "decided it would be preferable to maintain privacy."

"My character is a professional in adult entertainment, and I had studied Sean's films and recognized his commitment to authenticity. I was professionally ready for it. As an performer, I treated it as part of my job."

Her comments generated strong reactions from intimacy coordinators, mirroring the response to Gwyneth Paltrow's public statements, who recently shared that working on her new movie her latest film marked her initial experience with the relatively new profession, which she "did not know existed."

Paltrow's Perspective

During filming about comfort level with a specific move alongside fellow actor Timothée Chalamet, the actress answered: "I'm from the era where you get naked, you get in bed, the camera's on."

She continued that she and her co-star then told the professional: "We think we're good. You can step back.' I can't speak to how it is for emerging actors, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an artist, extremely restricted by that."

Professional Reaction

After these statements, industry executive an experienced producer described them as "irresponsible" and pointed out that most of those speaking against these professionals have established careers to command their own power and security on production locations.

"Periodically an actor makes comments about whether they appreciate intimacy coordinators or not," commented the executive. "The actress mentioned she came of age in a period when industry professionals 'took our kit off and proceeded professionally'. As a powerful woman in Hollywood performing alongside a man considerably junior than her, while I'm sure Chalamet is comfortable, I found it quite an irresponsible remark."

Actor's Viewpoint

Michael Douglas, meanwhile, expressed that he believes the primary responsibility during heterosexual sex scenes falls on the male performer, instead of a external professional.

"In my experience, you assume duty as the man to make certain the woman is comfortable, you discuss it completely," he said. "You communicate, '{OK, I'm going to touch you here if that's acceptable'. It's extremely careful but appears like it's occurring organically, which is ideally what convincing acting appears as."